Once again, the New York Times gives journalism a black eye with Oz coverage
Looking at this chronology of the NYT’s coverage of the Oz story really makes me wonder why they’re giving him a reach-around.
Here’s my summary of the coverage as extracted from the above linked search results:
- April 16, 2015: Real doctors criticize quack (AP)
- April 17, 2015: Mention of quack criticism in: Friday Briefing and New York Today: Stuffed
- April 17, 2015: Oz defends (AP via ABC as I’ve reached my NYT limit before everything is paywalled)