Not news: banks making bank on overdraft fees, to the tune of $30+ billion

Here’s a radical idea: let’s do away with unsecured overdraft altogether

According to Moebs Services, Inc., last year banks collected $31.9 billion in overdraft fees. This meme sums it up nicely, I think.

If banks only offered overdraft protection secured by savings, I’d be all for it. Further, if they let the customer personalize their preferences, largest first, smallest first, chronological, specified payees first, transaction type first, that would be even better. But make that an option solely for customers who secure that protection with a savings account specifically locked down for that purpose.

This plan might sound draconian, but if banks started letting debit transactions decline and checks bounce like they should when there’s insufficient funds, I think people would be a lot more cautious about their bank balances, especially when serious consequences like NSF charges from the payee, getting turned away by those payees after an established history of NSF checks, and the occasional passing bad checks charge with the police would be real risks again. Banks “warn” consumers who have overdraft protection unsecured by savings that the option isn’t to be abused as a line of credit, wink wink, but I think it’s self-evident that the predation qua service is abused by consumers as an easy line of credit in spite of that because that $36 fee today is better than going without food for a couple of days and besides, payday is just 1.5 weeks away so the bank can hit ’em again with that 7-day fee.

Eliminating that so-called service would reign in what is essentially a predatory lending scheme by any other name and force people to be more cautious because stores, landlords, mortgage holders, etc. will hit them with punitive NSF fees (or worse), give ’em the stink-eye for passing a rubber check, maybe refuse future checks, and payees might well call the cops for passing bad checks. Those are serious disincentives.

Getting declined at the register might be a real embarrassment, or even worse, a crisis, if, for example, the gas is already in the tank. This can be solved quite readily, though. There’s already data flowing back and forth. There’s already a monitor of some nature displaying information. The whole system is driven by databases. Certainly a few queries and if’then’s later would be able to resolve a fairly simple payment dilemma.

Further, if we eliminate the illusion of easy credit that isn’t, it will become even more apparent that hard times are just that, hard times. Perhaps that’s what it would take to galvanize voters into forcing whatever political action is necessary to address the most egregious and unjust disparities under which we suffer. Overdraft bank profiteering schemes just perpetuate the stupid consumer culture that keeps us hobbled.

Added bonus, there’s plenty of room in a solution like this for banks to make perhaps even more money. Starting a checking account? Here’s a deal, new customer! Open your checking account today, and you can start a “peace of mind” (POM) account to secure your checking against overdraft. We recommend starting your POM with the equivalent of one month net salary/wages. Don’t have it? No problem. Starting small is better than not starting at all. We’ll gladly loan you $50 to start, at a very fair rate of only 8% APR. For every transaction that’s not an even dollar amount, we’ll add the difference up to the next dollar for the transaction, and credit your POM balance accordingly until it’s fully paid off. You can even opt to keep “rounding up” to grow your POM account until it reaches the balance of your choice. Disclaimer: POM accounts are not interest bearing. Even better, upgrade your POM to a CD!

By combining the power of fractional lending with the sizzle of “even you can save” marketing, banks would have even greater reserves on hand. Maybe my banking-fu is off, but it seems to me banks would do far better to lend out $290 billion more at interest than to screw those least able to handle it to the tune of a measly $30 billion.

Granted, may this idea is a stinker, but every brainstorming session has its share of those. What would you suggest to rein in the practice?


One thought on “Not news: banks making bank on overdraft fees, to the tune of $30+ billion

  1. Any change is a step in the right direction currently. Although you noted they would make more money then they currently are. Maybe that is possible, there would be some calculations that I am not hard pressed to try currently. Though think of this, if they keep their over charge fees then the banks get to take money along with that interest they will charge for anything else. Lemme throw this scenario at ya:

    The average person needs a bank account right?
    This means all money is cycled through the bank first and foremost.
    When purchasing something the money basically trades banks or in some cases will go back to the bank anyway.

    I get the above statement from the following.
    Say you earn 1000$
    You have to deposit this into makebelieve credit union.
    You have a bill from somewhere association for 1000$
    You pay them.
    They put that money in their makebelieve credit union account.

    In the end the money is back to the bank, your account is zero. If the bank introduces charges they can force you to need 1000 + x at all times.

    While the interest seems a better thought it would only affect people who have an account or want to open one while the fees affect everyone at all times.

    Maybe that helped see the more devious side a bit better.



Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s