Horror in Aurora: Common decency vs. the media’s death paparazzi

Candlelight vigilLike millions of other Americans I first heard about the tragedy in Aurora, Colorado Friday morning. It was a sobering moment in the middle of my morning at work. Without more facts at my disposal, all I could do was think about the survivors and their families, even the family of the suspect in custody. I thought of the witnesses. I thought of the witnesses’ confidants. I thought of the employees. I thought of the first responders. I thought of people I know who may have been in the area. I thought of people that people I know may know who may have been there. When something horrible like this happens, the list of people to think of seems nearly infinite. This is the kind of event that leaves permanent scars on so many in so many ways. A survivor of my own traumas and intimate of other survivors, I could even then only guess at the pain and suffering felt by all involved. Work being work, however, I didn’t have the first-world luxury of distant rubbernecking and so didn’t hear any more of the massacre until later in the day. Once the day was done, however, and I could settle in for the evening, I detected a disturbing and entirely unsurprising trend. While people are suffering, countless others are already using the bodies for bully pulpits and cash cows. First, by way of email, I heard about Congressman Gohmert’s unseemly diarrhea of the mouth. There’s probably much more to be said about the quality of his comments, but this is neither the place nor time. Then I heard that President Obama’s campaign was pulling its contrast advertising  (a truly revolting euphemism if ever I heard one) attack ads. By the time I located the linked resource for that tidbit, the Romney campaign had already announced it was pulling all ads and the Obama campaign had “clarified” that it was pulling all, not just the attack ads. How nice for both of them. Then I heard that the media (surprise!) was flooding into Aurora.  Because what the survivors really need is a swarm of reporters and support staff, right? My first impulse, as noted above, was to feel for all directly and immediately concerned with the attack. My impulse in the evening was to rail. I tried fitfully, and finally just couldn’t do it. Instead, I posted to my Facebook page,

Re: Aurora, a) I’m beyond relieved that nobody I know and (so far as I know), nobody people I know know were present and/or injured. b) My thoughts go out to the victims, their families, and the family of the shooter. This is what tragedy requires. c) People who are politicizing the matter can choke on a bag of dicks.

Time has passed. The all-too-predictable politicizing has been running roughshod over the American landscape for four days now. Politicizing has been politicized. Not politicizing has been politicized. Politicizing has been unpoliticized. The media had its macabre festival all weekend. President Obama visited with families, Romney said he did the right thing in doing so, and otherwise their campaigns kept up the barrage of “contrast advertising.” Pundits on both sides of the imaginary aisle have predictably launched into the second amendment/gun control debate. In other news, other things happened, but nothing so important as whether the NCAA did or did not do enough of the right thing or wrong thing. Well, since the question, “too soon?” seems to have been more than adequately answered, indulge me, if you will. My thoughts are indeed with the victims’ families and with all those deeply, personally wounded by this tragedy. But you know what? There’s nothing special about these people or, dare I say it, their deceased loved ones, other than that they won one of the worst possible lotteries to win. Yet, America suddenly wakes up, rears its collective weepy head, and pours out its deepest sympathies and condolences. The president drops all his other executive responsibilities for a photo op. Both campaigns drop their obviously unseemly attacks in Colorado, but only there. The media goes into a feeding frenzy, as though we’re truly to believe it’s about the victims and about the journalism and not about ratings and advertising revenues (as seen from the top of our six-faced media monolith. Why? Where was the media frenzy and the presidential visit for the approximately 100 victims who die each year in Arizona alone…from domestic violence?  What about the grieving in Milwaukee?  Families who grieve for drunk driving fatalities? This might seem the height of tastelessness, but it’s a serious question, one I think deserves to be considered. What makes one death, ten deaths, a hundred deaths, more or less tragic and worthy of becoming the next national spectacle? What makes some victims more or less special and deserving of the massive outpouring of sympathy, politics and money? Honestly, seriously, if the press hadn’t made such a big deal of the shooting, would you have cared? How much? Because it was Aurora? Colorado? A theater? Because they were watching Batman? Because of the attack’s apparent randomness? It’s senselessness? Because Holmes is either clearly insane, evil, or both? Where’s the grief, the outrage, the will to address all of the senseless death we experience, day in, day out? Making this one’s token moment of giving a shit or a point of departure for pet political or religious issues just makes this tragedy a horrible backdrop for yet another cheap, tawdry display of mass superficiality. —- Image credit: Photograph by KOMUnews, licensed under Creative Commons.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s